conj., pron.
‘that, which’ (Modern English at)
PGmc Ancestor
*þat
Proposed ON Etymon (OIcel representative)
at ‘who, which, that’
(ONP at (conjunct.))
Other Scandinavian Reflexes
Far at, Icel að, Norw at, Dan at, OSw at, Sw att
OE Cognate
ðæt (conj. and adv.) ‘so that, in order that, after that, then, thence’
Phonological and morphological markers
Summary category
CC2c
Following three occurrences of OE æt as a conj. in late Nhb (see DOE s.v. æd, æt; SPS 415), ME at (conj., rel. pron.) is attested in N dial from the early 13c onwards, surviving into MnE (OED, EDD). The phrase þat at (that at) appears in a handful of MED's citations (s.v. that rel. pron.), mainly N/EM (but notice also e.g. c1450(c1415) Roy.Serm.(Roy 18.B.23)).
Occurrences in the Gersum Corpus
Pe 536; WA 10, 56, 68 etc.
Vant takes issue with Gordon’s argument against interpreting Pe 536 at as (1) (because at ‘does not occur as a relative elsewhere in this group of poems’, EVG 536n) by reading such an instance at Gaw 2205, where he maintains MS at (cp. emendations in TGD etc. and see Onions and Gordon 1933: 179).